Windows vista and vpn problem

Welcome to Tech Support Guy! Latest posts. System Restore Interrupted laptop now unbootable 4 Viewers Latest: redhawk50 1 minute ago.

Windows M 51 minutes ago. General Security. M 56 minutes ago. Windows 10 activity light. Latest: lunarlander Today at AM. M Today at AM. PC won't power on - dead PSU? Total: members: 6, guests: This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.

You won't be sorry replacing your TZ To continue this discussion, please ask a new question. Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. Unfortunately, when any of our Vista users try to connect they get the following error: "The network connection between your computer and the VPN server could not be established because the remote server is not responding. Thanks, Steve. Popular Topics in Cisco.

Which of the following retains the information it's storing when the system power is turned off? Submit ». GTRoberts This person is a verified professional. Verify your account to enable IT peers to see that you are a professional. Steve, we'll check the basics first Are these upgraded or freshly installed Vista boxes?

Have you tried using the native Cisco VPN client? Regards, Glen. JCAlexandres This person is a verified professional. If the User Account Control dialog box is displayed on the screen and prompts you to elevate your administrator token, select Continue.

It's the default value. When it's set to 0, Windows can't establish security associations with servers located behind NAT devices. When it's set to 1, Windows can establish security associations with servers that are located behind NAT devices.

Skip to main content. This browser is no longer supported. I have seen routing tables on Vista that have the wrong Network ID and subnet mask combinations, which will prevent routing from working properly which includes any gateway to gateway routing. This happens quite frequently if you are using addresses in the See below for an example of this anomaly I hope that this gives you one more place to look I share your frustration with Microsoft's ignorance with their networking disaster that they call Vista.

Otherwise, you can ignore the following related information Also, you cannot get Vista to correct the problem by statically assigning the addresses since it will still use the addresses provided by the server side before using the static addresses. For example, if you are establishing a VPN connection to a network that uses a network of The truth is that you actually are still connected to both networks, but your routing table is now corrupt. In this example, the routing table should have among other entries two routes that look like this likely with different gatweway and interface addresses :.

And, when you establish the second connection, instead of getting a second entry, the first one is overwritten like this:. To correct this, even after establishing both VPN connections, you can delete the Once you do that, you will immediately regain access to both remote networks. Has anyone other than myself reported these issues to Microsoft? I think the only way we can get them to fix their broken product is for all of us to call and complain like I have.